Q:
A: We should never forget that there is no "consensus" in science. Science just deals with facts. We don't have enough knowledge how the climate works, so researchers take guesses to fill in the missing information. If 50.1% of the people they ask say their guesses are plausible, then a consensus is formed. It's political, not science. Denialism is a negative phrase used when one doesn't have the intellectual heft to win an argument. When this happens, the other person results to name calling.
Related items
- What are the "religious" and/or "political" reasons someone would advocate AGW?
- why does it cost money to save out planet, to save man kind?
- Now that the very foundation of AGW denialism has been destroyed, what will the next scientific denial be?
- Now that the very foundation of AGW has been destroyed, what will the next 'Cause-Industry' be?
- If you don't beleive in global warming, then what?